Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Foydel's avatar

Nothing gets you closer or faster to civil war than people who think democracy is their political program. Democracy is a process; love the process and you'll love the country.

Kevi-B-Kev's avatar

The nature of your question leaves me to believe you don't understand what I was criticizing about the column. But here you go...

If you have rights, then use them. If you wholly disagree with the actions of your government and feel they do not represent the values of the people then you should exercise your right to (peacefully) protest and seek change. Was that not the crux of the events preceding the revolution - a series of protests demanding rights and representation against a government with greater interested in extraction than fair representation.

I think Jane Fonda's trip to Hanoi was ill advised and not constructive, but she was expressing her right to speech and protest and the belief that the actions of the US Government in that conflict were not in line with the values of the American People. It's akin to the notion that if you disagree with a representative body (school board, community sports league, HOA) then you obviously must hate that body and all that it represents (even your own interests), vs seeing your actions as an expression of devotion and representative participation.

So, you love our country and our representative system of government? Great! Pay your taxes, participate on a jury of your peers, fight for fair and equal access to the franchise (e.g. see earlier comment regarding formation of the union), condemn those who seek to undermine access to the franchise and democratic process (e.g. anti-democractic holdovers introduce to appease the southern colonies), and stand up for the rights of those who you do not care for or even find repugnant - Like Hanoi Jane, or in my case Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?