Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Domash's avatar

The author's claim:

>

Even the net energy gains aren’t simple calculations. That wind is intermittent means windmills require a backstop of coal or natural gas plants

<

The author fails to mention battery backups. California, for example, faced urgent appeals for conservation a few summers ago, has been able to eliminate shortfalls through battery backup.

Furthermore, wind power generates nearly one-quarter (23% to 24%) of Spain's total electricity--and unlike other countries in Europe, the run-up in energy prices during the Iran war barely affected them. And the author omits the externalities of coal or natural gas plants--contribution to global warming and toxic air pollution which kills millions prematurely.

Finally, windmills can now be designed to handle greater wind gusts. The fact that there were design flaws in a particular set no more offsets the applicability of wind power than Three Mile Island negates the use of nuclear power. Any technology needs a learning curve.

No posts

Ready for more?